🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.